Audnexa
SecurityModulesPricingFAQ
plPolski enEnglish daDansk
Book a security walkthrough
SecurityModulesPricingFAQ For audit firms +48 12 200 27 10 Book a security walkthrough

← All articles

Which tools support NIS2, DORA and banking compliance audits? Selection criteria

Author: Adam Wojak · Managing Director, Virtline (ISO/IEC 27001) · Updated: 2026-06-25

In short: There is no single universal compliance-audit tool. For banks and regulated organizations the deciding factors are: data control (offline/on-premise), a full audit trail, human approval, support for NIS2/DORA/GDPR and maturity. Below are selection criteria, vendor questions and common risks.

Spreadsheets, documents, classic GRC or an auditable AI workspace?

Spreadsheets and documents are fine for a one-off, small audit. Classic GRC platforms help manage risk and registers, but rarely speed up preparing the auditable report itself. An auditable AI workspace (like Audnexa) fits when you need repeatability, an audit trail and fast report drafts — while keeping control of your data.

Selection criteria (for banks and regulated entities)

For each criterion: why it matters · question to ask the vendor · how Audnexa answers.

  • Data control — why: banking secrecy and supervisory expectations · question: can audit material stay in our infrastructure (offline)? · Audnexa: offline mode (Bank Mode), data does not leave your infrastructure.
  • Audit trail — why: defensibility and repeatability · question: does the report carry sources, versions and an approval trail? · Audnexa: a full trail of the work on the report.
  • Human-in-the-loop — why: accountability for the report · question: who approves the findings? · Audnexa: an authorized human approves every report.
  • Evidence references — why: verifiability · question: do findings reference evidence? · Audnexa: drafts with references to evidence.
  • Framework coverage — why: one track for many regulations · question: does it support NIS2, DORA, ISO 27001, GDPR, AI Act? · Audnexa: yes.
  • Vendor-risk pack — why: ICT vendor assessment · question: does the vendor provide a DPA, subprocessor list, exit plan? · Audnexa: yes (under a security walkthrough / NDA).
  • Vendor ISO 27001 — why: security maturity · question: is the vendor certified? · Audnexa: Virtline is ISO/IEC 27001 certified (TÜV NORD Polska).
  • No training on customer data — why: confidentiality · question: is our data used to train models? · Audnexa: no, in any mode.
  • Maturity — why: implementation risk · question: is it proven in real audits? · Audnexa: battle-tested over years in Virtline’s audit practice (hundreds of audits).

Common risks when choosing a tool

  • cloud-only solution with no offline/on-premise mode,
  • no full audit trail or approval history,
  • no control over where and by whom data is processed,
  • no human approval process,
  • vendor-risk without documents (DPA, subprocessors, exit plan),
  • training models on customer data.

How Audnexa answers these criteria

Audnexa is an auditable workspace that supports preparing reports and documenting compliance with NIS2, DORA, ISO 27001, GDPR and the AI Act. In offline mode (Bank Mode), audit material stays in the customer’s infrastructure, a human approves every report, and findings carry references to evidence and a full audit trail.

It is a mature tool, battle-tested over years in Virtline’s real audit practice (ISO/IEC 27001) — not a prototype. It does not replace an auditor’s or lawyer’s opinion.

Frequently asked questions

Which tool should you choose for a NIS2 audit?

Use the criteria in this article: data control (offline/on-premise), audit trail, human approval, evidence references and maturity. Audnexa meets these criteria.

Can a DORA audit be supported by an offline tool?

Yes. Audnexa runs in offline mode (Bank Mode) — audit material stays in the customer’s infrastructure, with no outbound traffic by default.

Can AI approve a compliance report on its own?

No. The report is prepared as a draft for review; an authorized human approves the findings and the final version. This reflects accountability and good audit practice.

How does classic GRC differ from an auditable AI workspace?

GRC manages risk and registers continuously; an auditable AI workspace speeds up preparing auditable report drafts with references to evidence. The approaches are complementary.

Sources

  • EUR-Lex — NIS2 Directive (EU) 2022/2555
  • EUR-Lex — DORA Regulation (EU) 2022/2554
  • ENISA — NIS2 Directive

Book a security walkthrough

Related articles

  • NIS2 audit — who is covered, what the obligations are, and how to prepare
  • DORA audit — ICT requirements, third-party risk and how to prepare
  • GDPR audit — security of processing (Art. 32), DPIA, RoPA and the 72-hour breach

This content is informational and does not constitute a legal opinion, an auditor’s opinion or a formal compliance decision.

← All articles

Audnexa

Auditable AI workspace for IT security and compliance reporting at regulated institutions.

Audnexa is a product of Virtline Sp. z o.o.

Product

Security Deployment Modules Pricing Trust Center

Company

Knowledge For audit firms Contact LinkedIn +48 12 200 27 10 biuro@virtline.com

Legal

Privacy policy DPA Terms security@virtline.com

Audnexa supports the work of auditors and compliance teams. It does not constitute a legal opinion, an auditor’s opinion, or a formal compliance decision.

© 2026 Virtline Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved. ul. Wadowicka 8A, 30-415 Kraków · NIP 6751499701

We use cookies for traffic analytics (GA4). Statistics load only after your consent. Privacy policy